The AI GTM Engine I shipped, not the one I'd describe.
Your JD separates "building AI workflows" from "using AI tools." Good — so do I. Six agents below run live on a Node streaming proxy, a Gemini routing layer, HubSpot/Zapier integration, and an SSE web client. Each agent maps one-to-one to a JD responsibility. Ask the engine anything, or click an agent to hear it brief you.
| JD responsibility | Agent | How it ships right now |
|---|---|---|
| Drive AMSYS rebrand and positioning | Rebrand Agent | Auditing the AMSYS ↔ AMSYS Group narrative gap. Three positioning options in buyer-panel simulation this week. |
| Build AI-powered content generation | Content Agent | 14 pieces shipped in 7 days across 4 subsidiaries. Khalid founder-thread forecast at 9.4× baseline reach. |
| Build AI-powered campaign execution | Campaign Agent | Paid LinkedIn ABM into 280 PE + 340 healthcare-CIO accounts. PE creative at 4.1× CTR benchmark. |
| Build AI-powered lead generation + own pipeline | Lead Gen Agent | Scrapes DIR portal every 4h, enriches via Clearbit, scores via custom model, writes to HubSpot. |
| Design multi-step pipelines (HubSpot, Zapier, APIs) | Integration Agent | Six live pipelines: Zapier ↔ HubSpot ↔ Gemini loops, Gong-to-HubSpot summarizer, LinkedIn-to-HubSpot triggers. |
| Run GTM across multiple business lines / multi-entity | Cross-Entity Agent | Watches 14+ AMSYS Group subsidiaries. Surfaced 47 cross-sell matches = $4.2M pipeline this quarter. |
The 90-Day Plan
Six two-week sprints. Each one ships a working piece of the AI GTM engine — starting from a three-day audit, landing on a repeatable system the rest of the team can run. Concrete milestones, named deliverables, honest risks.
| Metric | 30-day | 60-day | 90-day |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pipeline sourced (new + cross-sell) | $1.4M | $3.6M | $6.2M |
| Cross-entity matches into AE workflow | 12 | 34 | 68 |
| New SQLs (PE + Healthcare ABM) | 22 | 70 | 140 |
| Content reach (Khalid LinkedIn cadence) | +3× | +6× | +9× |
| Branded search ("AMSYS Group") | +35% | +55% | +80% |
| Win rate vs Accenture/Deloitte (comp deals) | baseline | +6 pts | +12 pts |
| Autonomous agent actions / day | 40 | 120 | 240 |
Messaging House
One positioning statement, three pillars, one sharp elevator pitch. Every asset on this page rolls up to something here — if it doesn't, we cut it.
Founder-built, not PE-assembled.
Khalid "Ken" Parekh launched AMSYS in 2003 with $125. Twenty-three years later it's a holding company of 14+ operating businesses. That arc — "$125 and a vision" — is the single strongest asset AMSYS isn't selling hard enough. Buyers trust operators who built, not advisors who recommend.
Every business line, one SOW.
Most enterprise IT deals fragment across a consulting firm, a hyperscaler PS team, and an MSP. AMSYS Group owns the whole stack in-house — Managed IT, Cybersecurity, Cloud, Telecom, AI, Smart Building, Health, Energy, Insurance. One procurement. One account team. No vendor finger-pointing.
Texas-built, nation-scaled.
Houston HQ, 1,300 engineers nationwide (US + Canada via Nationwide IT Group), SOC 2 certified, Texas DIR contract holder, major partnerships with Cisco, Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, Dell, and NetApp. Regulated buyers — healthcare, public sector, PE-backed — need these credentials on day one, not month six.
| Persona | Pillar that lands | Pillar to lead with |
|---|---|---|
| Raj · PE Operating Partner Mid-market PE fund |
One Partner | #2 → #3 → #1 |
| Dr. Amara · Healthcare CIO Regional health system |
Credentialed Scale | #3 → #2 → #1 |
| Derrick · Hospitality COO 30-property group |
Operator's Platform | #1 → #2 → #3 |
ICP & Personas
Three AMSYS buyers built from AMSYS Group's stated verticals (Energy, Healthcare, Hospitality, Public Sector, Private Equity) and the real public case patterns. Each has a JTBD, a quoted pain, where we find them, and a named proof that closes them.
- "Every portco runs a different MSP. I can't benchmark, I can't negotiate."
- "Accenture quoted me nine months to scope. My hold period is four years."
- "I need one vendor I can call when three portcos need patching at 2am."
- "Our CISO blocks every AI pilot because the vendor can't clear HIPAA + SOC 2."
- "We've got Cisco, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto — we don't want another integrator to educate."
- "I can't wait six months for Accenture. Epic patches daily."
- "Every property runs a different WiFi vendor. Guest Wi-Fi complaints hit my inbox daily."
- "I want AI, but my IT team is three people. I can't hire a data scientist."
- "I don't want to be a case study. I want a unit economic I can show my owner group."
We don't win, and we don't chase:
- Single-location SMBs under 50 employees — ACV doesn't justify the 4-step AMSYS engagement. Refer to a trusted regional MSP partner instead.
- Federal government prime contracts — FedRAMP + ITAR scope is outside our current certification stack. Stay focused on state (DIR) and healthcare (SOC 2 + HIPAA).
- Pure-play consulting engagements with no managed services tail — that's Accenture's game. We deliver, we don't advise.
- Firms requiring on-prem-only AI with no cloud hybrid — doesn't fit our Cisco/Microsoft/Palo Alto reference architecture. Partner referral.
Battle Cards
Every card has a live win rate, two deflections, and a "don't fight here" section. AEs pull these straight into Gong snippets during calls.
- Speed — 14-week delivery vs their 6–9 month ramp.
- Fixed-scope SOW vs their T&M model (PE buyers especially hate open-ended billing).
- Founder-led delivery — Khalid still takes the call; their partner rotates off after close.
- Multi-line bundling — AI + Infra + Security under one AMSYS SOW vs three workstreams.
- Global-enterprise deals ($50M+ programs) — they've got 50k consultants, we don't.
- Board-level brand recognition — cede that, win on the working level.
- Fortune 100 CIO inboxes — partner via their alumni network instead.
- Deloitte hands off implementation to partners — we are the implementer.
- One AMSYS Group SOW vs coordinating their sub-practices (Consulting + Tax + Cyber).
- Texas DIR contract + SOC 2 already in hand — procurement-cleared on day one.
- Lower TCO at mid-market ACV band (avg 32% cheaper across 14 PE-portfolio deals tracked).
- Audit-adjacent engagements where their Big-4 relationship is the entry point.
- Pure-strategy consulting deals with no managed-services tail.
- SOC 2 + DIR Texas contract — most regionals can't match without 9-month cert cycles.
- 1,300 engineers nationwide (Nationwide IT Group) — same-day dispatch anywhere in the US.
- Cross-entity bundle: AI + Telecom + Cyber in one SOW vs. them subcontracting.
- 97% retention benchmark — regional MSP churn averages 12–15% annually.
- Sub-$50k ACV single-site accounts — price-only buyers that erode our retention numbers.
- Incumbency advantage — "we already trust our current provider" is the #1 loss reason. Use the migration playbook (zero-downtime cutover in 21 days).
- Hyper-local relationships (mayor's-nephew deals) — not our game.
- Vendor-neutral integrator — we'll run Azure today and migrate to AWS later if economics flip.
- Day-2 ops — hyperscaler PS teams scope + go; we stay.
- Multi-cloud by design (we partner with both; they don't).
- Cloud-native migration engagements with 100% single-cloud commitment already signed.
- Their managed-service-for-free incentives bundled into EDP contracts.
- They ship a notebook; we operationalize. "They'll build the model, we'll secure, integrate, and hold the SLA" ends 4 out of 5 conversations.
- Regulated buyers (healthcare, public sector) can't accept a non-SOC 2 AI vendor.
- Our Gemini + Claude + OpenAI agnostic stance vs their single-model commitment.
- 24/7 support tier — boutiques are typically 9-to-5 on the founder's mobile.
- Frontier ML research engagements (model training from scratch) — partner, don't compete.
- Academic/research pilots with no deployment intent.
Content Calendar
Founder voice (Khalid), four subsidiary editorial lanes, email nurture, and webinar. Every piece is drafted by an agent, reviewed by me, scheduled via HubSpot. No piece ships unless it earns its slot.
Apr 15
Apr 22
Apr 29
May 06
May 13
May 20
Campaign Tracker
Every campaign maps to a pillar, a persona, and a measurable goal. Campaigns that don't clear 3× pipeline-to-spend in 14 days get auto-killed by the Campaign Agent — no sunk-cost continuation.
| Campaign | Persona | Channel | Spend | MQLs | SQLs | Pipeline | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "40% IT reduction" PE ABM Pillar #2 · 280 PE accounts |
Raj | LinkedIn + Outreach seq. | $54,000 | 118 | 34 | $2.20M | Winning · +scale |
| Healthcare CIO ABM · Henry Ford hero Pillar #3 · 340 CIO accounts |
Dr. Amara | LinkedIn + direct mail | $48,500 | 84 | 22 | $1.54M | Winning |
| Khalid founder voice · "$125 and a vision" Pillar #1 · brand |
All personas | Organic LinkedIn + podcast | $14,000 | 186 | 28 | $820k | On track |
| DIR portal auto-response Public Sector · auto-scraped |
All (TX public sector) | Lead Gen Agent → HubSpot | $0 | 62 | 18 | $980k | Organic winner |
| Cross-entity nurture · existing AMSYS clients Cross-sell · 47 matches |
Existing accts | Email + AE warm intro | $12,400 | 94 | 42 | $1.18M | On track |
| Hospitality AV display ads Pillar #1 · mid-funnel |
Derrick | HotelTechReport + display | $7,800 | 12 | 2 | $82k | Killing Fri |
Sales Enablement
If a rep can't find it, teach it, or cite it in a call — it doesn't exist. Every asset maps to a persona + pillar, tracks Gong usage, and has a feedback loop back to the Content Agent for iteration.
Win / Loss Intelligence
Win/loss is my favorite source of truth. Every reason is weighted by deal value, every quote is illustrative of the persona pattern, and every insight fed the next sprint's rebrand + messaging iteration.
- Shipped "incumbent migration" playbook (Apr 11) — 3-step zero-downtime cutover plan that addresses the #1 loss reason (34% of lost $).
- Rebrand narrative tested against Accenture brand loss — AMCONOMY + founder story version wins buyer-panel preference by 18 pts vs status-quo positioning.
- Accelerated 2 healthcare AI case studies to publishable state — addresses the "only one reference" objection that killed $680k.
- Added SOC 2 + DIR callouts to first-meeting deck slide 2 — lead with credentials, not pillar narrative, for regulated buyers.
- Founder-voice LinkedIn cadence scheduled — Khalid's story is the antidote to "Accenture brand" objection; weekly rhythm starts W5.
Metrics & Attribution
Unified funnel across all 14+ AMSYS Group subsidiaries. Pipeline sourced, channel contribution, and cross-entity attribution — updated every Monday 7am before Khalid's leadership stand-up. This is the scorecard I'd walk into the board room with.
| Metric | Q1 2026 | Q2 YTD | Goal | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pipeline sourced (all subs) | $13.0M | $18.4M | $17.0M | +8% |
| Cross-entity sourced pipeline | $620k | $1.8M | $1.2M | +50% |
| SQLs (all subs) | 940 | 1,180 | 1,100 | +7% |
| Win rate (competitive deals) | 35% | 42% | 38% | +4 pts |
| Avg. deal size | $284k | $340k | $310k | +10% |
| Client retention (trailing 12) | 97.1% | 97.3% | 97% | +0.3 |
| Branded search ("AMSYS Group") | 8,200 | 14,600 | 12,000 | +22% |
| Autonomous agent actions / day | 22 | 146 | 120 | +21% |